On Pathological Rationalism and Other Epistemological Issues in the Indo-European Controversy | GeoCurrents

Epistemological issues lie near the core of the Indo-European controversy. How we acquire knowledge of the world is, in turn, one of the abiding issues of philosophy. At the risk of gross simplification, most claims to knowledge are based either on reason and evidence or on deference to accepted authorities. The latter foundation is generally religious “it must be true because it is in the Bible/Quran etc.”, but can be based on secular idea systems “it must be true because Aristotle/Marx etc. said so”. But such authority-based beliefs are seldom open to question, and hence have little bearing on actual intellectual debates. By the same token, appeals to intuition or mystical experiences carry no weight in scholarly discourse. In this realm, reason and evidence generally reign supreme.

via On Pathological Rationalism and Other Epistemological Issues in the Indo-European Controversy | GeoCurrents.

Advertisements

One thought on “On Pathological Rationalism and Other Epistemological Issues in the Indo-European Controversy | GeoCurrents

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s